The decision to construct the 24-hour Economy Model Market at Oseikojokrom is a step in the right direction, grounded in practical economic and social benefits.
A 24-hour market system expands trading hours beyond the traditional daytime schedule, allowing traders, artisans, and service providers to operate in shifts. This increases productivity, boosts sales, and creates more employment opportunities, especially for the youth and informal sector workers who form a significant part of Ghana’s economy and that of Bia West.
The project aligns with the government’s broader 24-hour economy policy, which seeks to stimulate inclusive growth and maximize the use of infrastructure. With funding from the District Assemblies Common Fund, it ensures public investment is directed toward sustainable development that benefits the entire community.
While some concerns have been raised about siting the Market at Oseikojokrom instead of the District Capital (Essam or Debiso), these claims do not reflect the actual basis for the decision.
Earlier, I shared similar sentiments about the siting of the 24-hour Economy Model Market. However, after further engagements and my own independent findings, it is clear that Oseikojokrom is a deserving and strategic choice.
Let us focus on facts rather than propaganda or unfounded claims.
Firstly, the decision to locate the project at Oseikojokrom is guided by strategic and technical considerations, not personal interests. Feasibility assessments for such projects typically consider factors such as land availability, accessibility, population density, and the potential to stimulate new economic growth corridors.
The market is expected to serve as a commercial hub for Oseikojokrom and surrounding communities, attracting investors, improving access to goods and services, and enhancing livelihoods. Ultimately, this initiative will contribute to local economic transformation, reduce unemployment, and support long-term community development.
Developing infrastructure outside district capitals is a deliberate approach to ensure equitable distribution of development. Concentrating all major projects in Essam or Debiso would risk overburdening those areas while leaving other parts of the district underdeveloped.
By situating the market at Oseikojokrom, the project promotes balanced growth and opens up new areas for commercial activity.
Finally, the assertion that the decision is influenced by the residence of the Member of Parliament is unfounded and lacks evidence.
Public infrastructure projects of this scale go through administrative, technical, and governmental approval processes, ensuring that decisions are made in the broader interest of the district rather than individual preferences.
It is important to dismiss claims that the decision is influenced by the residence of any political figure. Such assertions are not supported by evidence and only serve to distract the good people of Bia West from the real developmental benefits of the project.
In moving forward, our focus should remain on the long-term gains, job creation, increased local revenue, improved livelihoods, and overall district growth. Oseikojokrom is not just a choice; it is a strategic investment in the future of the entire district and a step in the right direction.
Abugri Peter
Personal Assistant to the District Chief Executive
Bia West
